Email Spam 2018
Recently I
received an email from a person I didn't know who was promoting his
relatively new self-published book. As a self-published author myself, I
wondered how this person knew about me. Had he perhaps read my
CreateSpace-published books—Patches
on the Same Quilt, Them That
Go, or Miracle
of the Concrete Jesus & Other Stories?
I'm pretty sure he
hadn't. Since his email had also been sent to several others, it looks like he harvested my name and contact info from the website of
a group where I am a member.
Here's what he wrote—with name, title, etc.,
redacted. While I consider any email that hits my in-box fair game, I do not
wish to embarrass those who don't know better. Hence, the redacted info in the
email I'm publishing here for educational purposes:
I'm
new to [BIG WRITING GROUP], having authored a non-fiction book on [Title redacted] available on Amazon in Kindle for $20 and a
paperback version for $24.65, and soon a smaller paperback.
There is no way that I
would ever spend over $10 on an ebook by a well-known author, so I'm unlikely
to buy an ebook by an unknown author on a subject that doesn’t interest me. I
don't think I'm the target audience for this book. Plus, the following
paragraph isn’t a book summary, nor is it a hook to entice folks to buy the
book. I’m not sure what it is:
The
current "batch" of Justice, FBI and Congressional "silence
breakers" is for . . . [employees
who reported waste, fraud or abuse] who usually "blow their whistles
seemingly too late", while really they are held in silence by government
agencies. These were started by the First Continental Congress in 1777.
That didn't work well, as 90 years later government fraud almost lost
the Civil War for the Union until Congress passed and Abraham Lincoln signed
the False Claims Act in 1862, "deputizing and rewarding all citizens
reporting fraud".
Commas and periods
belong inside end quotation marks. Writers know that. Writers also know that
over-use of quotation marks (unless quoted material is being cited) is really
annoying to readers.
I left out some stuff in
the next paragraph (which also isn't a book summary or an effective hook):
The
threat and quick governmental legal action worked until WWII when public
sources enabled hundreds of civilian [. . . ] cases to be filed [. . . ] on
military contractors that were settled in courts before the Justice Department
even knew about them, too late the Attorney General claimed to
pursue criminal action, against large influential Corporate
political contributors. So Congress made cases "secret", keeping
them "under seal" in Federal Courts, where most stayed uninvestigated
and untried in Courts. A few are settled after 5 years or so
"under seal" but recovered less than 1% of what was accused of
having been stolen from taxpayers. Mine was filed in 1998 [. . . ] It was
supposedly "dismissed", I believe illegally [. . . .] Over $1 billion
unpaid in Virginia!
From that paragraph, even with the deleted
info included, I had a heckuva time figuring out what the book was actually
about. Plus I'm even more annoyed by the comma/quotation mark misuse. The
spammer changes tone in the next paragraph, though:
Being a
novice, I thought libraries bought books, especially by local authors, and
especially in eBook formats that take no room on shelves.
No,
that isn't how it works at all. Libraries subscribe to a service that provides
access to ebooks. The service gets to pick which ebooks. Your local librarian
could have told you that. As a fomer member of my county's library board, I
know that some libraries will buy print copies of books by unknown authors if
several of library patrons request the book, but libraries have fixed budgets
and must use their funds to buy books that will be checked out by more than a
few card-holders.
However, if a library allows you to do a presentation about your book (which includes your selling/signing your book), you should donate a copy of your book as a way of thanking that library.
Since
that is not the case, I next thought that joining writers groups who are
non-profit and giving them half the profits would work, If I could stimulate
sales of their books as well, in return.
I have
no clue how that would actually work—and I've been a member of various writers
groups since 1994. But I can tell you—from personal experience—that
self-published authors have doggone few profits. Factor in costs to get to
venues that aren't close to home and you could even end up with negative
profits.
If you can't stimulate sales of your own book, you are unlikley to stimulate sales of others' books.
The basic
concept is to "leapfrog" libraries who can't purchase anything and go
directly to "Book Clubs", who I believe are not only looking for
"local stories", but are or have contemplated writing one themselves.
My experience is in order to complete a book you have to be persistent and are
best served "buying from local experts".
There's that doggone comma/quotation mark error
again. Arggghhh! I'm not sure what " 'leapfrog' libraries" means. As
for book clubs (or, as you put it, "Book Clubs"), they are for readers—people
who enjoy reading and discussing books with like-minded folks. People in writers
groups are the ones who have contemplated writing books.
Many "Book Clubs" book clubs in my area choose their selections a year or so in advance. Most that I'm familiar with meet monthly, so they don't choose more than a dozen books a year.
At my
website, [title redacted] you'll see my target is a big one "the
$20 Trillion National Debt" that shows it is "costing each American
over $62,000" for which none received anything of value. Buyers
do receive something of value in seeing all the information [. . . ], and
$10 if they buy [my book] at my website to their charity of choice, which I
will inform them [BIG WRITING GROUP] qualifies as, and I will target to each [BIG
WRITING GROUP] Chapter areas and give names in my marketing to those who make
presentations.
Only
basic information—not "full information"—for all members is on the
writing group's site (where he found my contact info). And anyone accessing the
site has to know an author's name to be able to look up the
info. But—since I intend this post to be educational—let me digress
into giving a bit of info that might be helpful to self-publishing novices:
Go to
writing conferences and symposiums. I've blogged in the past about some writing events
I've attended, such as this symposium
and this
publishers' day at Virginia Festival of the Book.
Read
books about writing. Your
library should have some. Start there, but be aware of many articles, blog
posts, etc. that exist online. Over a decade ago, I blogged about "Books
that Every Writer Should Read." On this blog I've also reviewed some
writing books—like Shut Up and
Write and The
Writer's Essential Tackle Box.
Read
about promotion and marketing. Lots of online articles and blogs address
marketing. The Behler blog is
a good place to start. I've previously blogged about what I didn't want to do
for book promotion ("Book
Promotion—NOT") and what I might do ("Book
Promotion—Maybe").
Join a local writers group. Members who have been there/done that can help you with your concerns and questions. They can explain hat works and doesn't work for book promotion. But, please—don't spam them.
~
Labels: spam, writers, writers group